Are Your Snacks Secretly Controlling You? Lawsuit Spills All

Big Food’s dirty tricks exposed—could that chip bag be your brain’s puppet master?

In partnership with

Big Food on Trial: Are Ultra-Processed Foods Truly Addictive? 🍟🧠

Welcome, EudaLifer!

You’ve seen the headlines: A major lawsuit is accusing some of the biggest ultra-processed food (UPF) companies of engineering addictive products—complete with secret labs, brain scans, and decades of hidden research. Could your favorite snack really be playing tricks on your brain?

Today’s email breaks down:

  • Why there’s a lawsuit claiming Big Food mimicked Big Tobacco’s methods

  • The science behind UPF’s addictive potential

  • How these engineered foods target your dopamine pathways (and your kids!)

  • Key studies revealing UPF’s grip on your brain and hormones

Ready to discover what’s really going on behind that crinkly bag of chips? Let’s dig in! 👇

1. From Smoking to Snacking: Why a Lawsuit Is Erupting 🔥

A new lawsuit asserts that after Big Tobacco giants bought up major food companies in the 1980s, they:

  • Used tobacco addiction tactics (including brain research) to develop ultra-processed foods

  • Aggressively marketed to children and minorities, aiming for lifelong customers

  • Fueled America’s surge in Type 2 Diabetes, obesity, and fatty liver disease among youth

Key Evidence includes:

  • Internal memos showing secret labs studying brain scans and human electrodes (originally for cigarette design)

  • Foods carefully engineered for “craveability,” leveraging a combination of sugar, fat, salt, and flavor additives

  • Over $2 billion yearly spent on marketing junk food to kids, with one exec admitting: “We focus on children because that’s where our strength is.”

Result? Unprecedented rates of chronic diseases in children. Attorneys say it’s no coincidence: “These products are designed to be as addictive as nicotine.”

2. What Makes Ultra-Processed Foods So Hard to Resist? 😵

a) Dopamine Overdrive

The biggest hallmark of addiction is a massive spike in dopamine, your brain’s reward chemical.

  • High-sugar or high-fat UPFs trigger dopamine surges akin to nicotine or alcohol.

  • Combination of sugar + fat has a “supra-additive” effect, lighting up the brain’s reward center more than either alone.

  • Over time, you build tolerance, needing more to feel the same “high.”

Translation? The more you eat, the more your brain expects that rush. Cue cravings, binge-eating, and feeling unsatisfied by “normal” foods.

b) Gut-Brain Hijack

UPFs also exploit your gut-brain axis:

  • Refined sugars/fats can disrupt hunger hormones (ghrelin, leptin), tricking the body into thinking it’s still hungry.

  • Your gut sends dopamine signals even before taste hits—meaning the anticipation alone can create cravings.

  • Chronic intake can lead to insulin resistance and inflammation, further messing up appetite control.

c) Brain Circuit Changes

Regular exposure to hyper-palatable foods:

  • Downregulates dopamine receptors, much like drug addiction. You’ll eat more but enjoy it less.

  • Impairs the prefrontal cortex (your “stop” signal), lowering impulse control.

  • Turns eating from a pleasurable choice into a compulsion—classic addiction pattern.

3. The “Secret Sauce” in Your Snack Bag 🍫🌪️

Ever wonder why you can’t eat just one cookie or handful of chips? Science points to four main drivers:

  1. High Sugar: Rapid blood sugar spikes → big dopamine release → “I need more!”

  2. Refined Fats: Creamy, rich mouthfeel + dopamine = heightened reward signals.

  3. Salt & Flavor Enhancers: Boost taste intensity, can magnify cravings.

  4. Rapid Delivery: Soft textures, liquids, or easy-to-chew forms = quick absorption → fast “hit” akin to inhaled nicotine.

Note: Whole foods rarely trigger this extreme response. It’s the engineered synergy of sugar, fat, salt, and additives that hijacks our reward system.

4. The Lawsuit’s Core Claim: A Long Tobacco-Style Playbook 🚬➡️🍔

The lawsuit highlights parallels between UPF companies and tobacco:

  • Secret R&D: Tobacco scientists used electrode brain scans to intensify nicotine addiction. They later shared these methods with Kraft, General Foods, Nabisco, etc.

  • Child Targeting: Just as tobacco had Joe Camel, food giants developed cartoons, bright packaging, and school marketing to hook children early.

  • Disinformation: They funded outcome-driven studies, pushing “personal responsibility” narratives to distract from the addictive design of UPFs.

Outcome? Over two-thirds of children’s diets come from UPFs, and pediatric Type 2 Diabetes, once extremely rare, soared in the 2000s.

5. Key Studies That Prove It’s Not Just “Willpower” 🧬

Below are a few landmark experiments:

  1. Hall et al., 2019 (NIH Study)

    • Design: Two groups ate diets matched in calories/nutrients: one group had all-UPF meals, the other whole foods.

    • Result: The UPF group ate 500+ extra calories per day and gained ~1 pound per week—despite identical macros.

    • Interpretation: There’s something about processing (not just nutrients) that drives overeating.

  2. DiFeliceantonio et al., 2018

    • Focus: Mix of high sugar + high fat.

    • Finding: People’s brains showed supra-additive activation in reward centers. They worked harder for these foods, resembling drug-seeking behavior.

  3. Gearhardt & DiFeliceantonio, 2023

    • Conclusion: Ultra-processed foods meet scientific criteria for addiction, including compulsive use and withdrawal symptoms.

    • Implication: UPF can be as habit-forming as substances like nicotine.

  4. Avena et al.

    • Animal Model: Rats given sugar-rich diets developed binge patterns, dopamine downregulation, and signs of withdrawal when sugar was removed—mirroring opiate withdrawal behaviors.

6. Why This Matters to You (and Your Kids) 👨‍👩‍👧

  • Childhood Health Crisis: Diseases like Type 2 Diabetes, fatty liver disease, and early obesity are skyrocketing in youth.

  • Addictive Marketing: Billions spent to ensure snacks grab attention, bypass self-control, and stick in young brains.

  • Hidden Risk: “Healthier” UPFs aren’t exempt; the lawsuit argues the processing itself is the main problem, not just sugar/fat levels.

  • Personal Struggle: If you feel “out of control” around certain foods, it’s not just you—it’s a designed effect.

7. So…What Now? 🌱

  1. Awareness: Recognize UPFs may be manipulating your brain. Look for short ingredient lists with minimal additives.

  2. Focus on Whole/Minimally Processed Foods: Think fruits, veggies, whole grains, natural proteins—foods close to their natural form.

  3. Kid-Friendly Shifts: Replace typical snack foods with “real” yet tasty options. Gradual changes can help reduce cravings.

  4. Watch Marketing: Limit kids’ screen time and exposure to ads. Marketers know how to trigger “pester power.”

  5. Stay Informed: The lawsuit could spark more public disclosure—like “Big Tobacco” documents did. If more evidence emerges, there may be new policies on food marketing, labeling, or addictive additives.

Remember: The debate over UPF is no longer just about “calories in, calories out.” Scientists increasingly confirm these foods act on the brain like addictive substances. Knowledge is power—so keep reading labels, cooking at home, and championing healthy habits for you and your family.

A Final Word of Encouragement 🤗

Shifting away from ultra-processed snacks isn’t always simple, especially when the deck is stacked against us. But every small step—like finding one favorite homemade alternative—helps you break free from that dopamine rollercoaster. You’ve got this, EudaLife!

P.S. Know someone hooked on their daily junk-food fix? Hit “Forward”—they might be shocked to learn it’s not just “lack of willpower.”

Until next time,
Team EudaLife

References & Further Reading


The Lawsuit & Background:

  • Martinez v. Kraft Heinz, Mondelez, et al. (2024). Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, filed December 10, 2024.

  • Moss, M. (2013). Salt, Sugar, Fat: How the Food Giants Hooked Us. Random House.

Addictive Mechanisms Research:

  • Gearhardt, A.N., & DiFeliceantonio, A.G. (2023). "Highly processed foods can be considered addictive substances based on established scientific criteria." Addiction, 118(4), 589-598.

  • Hall, K.D. et al. (2019). "Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake." Cell Metabolism, 30(1), 67-77.

  • DiFeliceantonio, A.G. et al. (2018). "Supra-Additive Effects of Combining Fat and Carbohydrate on Food Reward." Cell Metabolism, 28(1), 33-44.

  • Avena, N.M. et al. (2008). "Evidence for sugar addiction: Behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake." Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(1), 20-39.

Dopamine & Brain Reward:

  • Volkow, N.D. et al. (2011). "Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: implications for obesity." Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 37-46. (Available on PMC: PMC3036794).

  • Colantuoni, C. et al. (2001). "Excessive sugar intake alters binding to dopamine and mu-opioid receptors in the brain." Neuroreport, 12(16), 3549-3552. (Available on PubMed: PMID 11733709).

Gut-Brain Axis:

  • Hall, K.D. et al. (2019). "Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake." Cell Metabolism, 30(1), 67-77. (Replaces unverifiable Hamano et al., 2024).

  • Tan, H.E. et al. (2020). "The gut-brain axis mediates sugar preference." Cell, 181(5), 1116-1127.

Marketing to Children:

  • Harris, J.L. et al. (2019). "Increasing disparities in unhealthy food advertising targeted to Hispanic and Black youth." Public Health Nutrition, 22(1), 1-11. (Replaces unverifiable Nguyen et al., 2019).

  • Federal Trade Commission (2012). "A Review of Food Marketing to Children and Adolescents: Follow-Up Report." (Supports $2 billion figure, approximates CSPI claim).

Global Health Warnings:

  • Monteiro, C.A. et al. (2019). "Ultra-processed foods, diet quality, and health using the NOVA classification system." Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

  • World Health Organization (2023). "WHO guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children." (Includes UPF discussion, replaces unverifiable WHO/FAO 2024).

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only. Always consult a healthcare professional for personalized advice.

Looking for unbiased, fact-based news? Join 1440 today.

Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.

Reply

or to participate.